The Supreme
Court has upheld the Allahabad high court’s verdict to quash provision of
reservation for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST) officers and
employees in promotions. During last one decade and more , almost all
government departments , public sector banks and public sector
undertaking in general have given benefits of promotion based on quota to SC/ST
and OBC category to please their vote bank , to please a few castiest
politicians denying the opportunity to those who possess better record of performance
.
I would like to suggest government to continue
quota on recruitment if it is unavoidable and warranted to fulfill their social
welfare agenda but completely stop quota system in promotion to SC/ST/OBC
because this dirty game adversely affects the morale of those employees who
perform better , honestly and devotedly but rejected only because they belong
to general caste category.
In an organization if a person is promoted
only because he or she belongs to Dalit category even if he or she is
non performer, dishonest and corrupt in his action vitiate the atmosphere,
adversely affects the work culture and demotivate those who use to work
sincerely and think for the nation as a patriot .It will not be an exaggeration
to say that such type of dirty politics has only given rise to cancer of
corruption all over the country and resulted in mass disloyalty to nation and
the organization the employee serves.
Undoubtedly this dirty politics has tarnished the image of the country in
international community too.
The only solution to deal with this grave
problem arising out of Supreme Court verdict and consequent denial of quota in
promotion is to give promotion strictly based on seniority.
This system will have dual advantage. Firstly there will not any thrust from
SC/ST/OBC section on implementation of quota system in promotion or on issue of
ordinance to nullify the impact of Supreme Court verdict .Secondly corrupt top
ranked officers will not get opportunity to sell promotion and to whimsically
reject any employee in promotion process only because he or she is not
flatterer.
Hitherto even corrupt officers used to
be elevated to higher post if he or she has a backing of minister, or
key politicians or powerful top officers.
Officers who had the blessings
of Godfather used to get chance in interview and others used to be whimsically
rejected by greedy members of Interview panel constituted for
carrying out promotion processes in various offices and departments.
And the most disheartening part of this story is that if
officers who were unjustifiably rejected in promotion process by
selecting committee used to approach courts for justice but unfortunately in our
country such cases remain undecided for decades. In such case, one can say
without any doubt that all government offices use courts to perpetuate their
reign of injustice. An individual can spend a few thousand rupees to contest
his case in High Court or Supreme Court but the defendant being an
government office can spend crores of rupees to postpone judgment for an
indefinite period. This is why thousands of staff related cases have been
languishing in various courts for decades and as a result , an employee has to
bear with injustice till his death or retirement.
Lastly but not the least if seniority based promotion is put
into action , quantum of flattery and blind support to bosses will stop and
people will make efforts to say yes only when the proposal is justified and
without any bias and prejudice. People will dare raise their voice against
injustice of their bosses. Whistle blower will be able to puncture the
possible mischievous plan of corrupt officers and ministers without any fear of
repercussion on his career.
If at all it is found that employees do not perform only because
he or she is sure of seniority based promotion, government and every department
may frame a suitable policy to punish suitably to non performers and remove
them if their non performance persist for a longer period. Such punitive action
of course should take place based on written record and adjudged by a team of
at least five good officers. Of course there are some disadvantages in
seniority based promotions but these disadvantages become insignificant when we
ascertain the impact of practice of whimsical and arbitrary promotion of bad
officers at the cost of good officers and when we assess the impact of system
of flattery and bribery on work culture.
Normally whenever a new Chief Minister joins as Head of any state Government , his first and foremost task is transfer IAS and IPS officers as also other workers from one place to other and pick up officers of his choice who work is say always "Yes sir " "sir" on all proposals of the government blindly.Person selected even for the post of Governor of any state or for President of India is decided on his ability to work as rubber stamp of the government.Similarly officers who are doubtless rubber stamp of bosses are only picked up for promotion in any Public sector undertaking . All these whimsical decisions will be reduced to minimum when government decides to award seniority based promotion and frame a fool proof policy for transfer and posting as also for punishing a non performer.
Normally whenever a new Chief Minister joins as Head of any state Government , his first and foremost task is transfer IAS and IPS officers as also other workers from one place to other and pick up officers of his choice who work is say always "Yes sir " "sir" on all proposals of the government blindly.Person selected even for the post of Governor of any state or for President of India is decided on his ability to work as rubber stamp of the government.Similarly officers who are doubtless rubber stamp of bosses are only picked up for promotion in any Public sector undertaking . All these whimsical decisions will be reduced to minimum when government decides to award seniority based promotion and frame a fool proof policy for transfer and posting as also for punishing a non performer.
UP governor clears ordinance quashing promotion quota
LUCKNOW: Uttar Pradesh governor BL Joshion Sunday gave his nod to a draft ordinance quashing dalit quota in promotions of government employees. The ordinance overturns Mayawati's five-year-old reservation policy and comes 10 days after the Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad high court order. The UP cabinet was quick to implement the court order through an ordinance to woo to its core OBC constituency before the urban bodies poll.
The ordinance will affect promotions of over 16 lakh state employees in general and OBC categories. The SP government is confident about getting the ordinance passed when the assembly convenes as it enjoys absolute majority. The ordinance seeks to do away with Section 3(7) and Section 8(A) of the UP government employee seniority rules that brought the controversial caste-based quotas in promotions.
The ordinance will affect promotions of over 16 lakh state employees in general and OBC categories. The SP government is confident about getting the ordinance passed when the assembly convenes as it enjoys absolute majority. The ordinance seeks to do away with Section 3(7) and Section 8(A) of the UP government employee seniority rules that brought the controversial caste-based quotas in promotions.
Ordinance to scrap Maya promotion quota gets Governor’s nod
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/ordinance-to-scrap-maya-promotion-quota-gets-governors-nod/946306/
Governor B L Joshi on Sunday gave his assent to an ordinance which amends the Uttar Pradesh Public Servants (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Castes) Act, 1994, abolishing reservation in promotions for government employees.
The state cabinet had approved the ordinance last Friday. It had also deleted rule 8 (a) of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, which conferred the benefit of “consequential seniority” on SC/ST employees, giving them an advantage over other employees.
On April 27, the Supreme Court had upheld the Allahabad High Court decision, holding that the UP government's policy of reservation in promotions, which was introduced by the previous Mayawati government, was ultra vires of the Constitution. The Mayawati government had challenged the high court judgment in the Supreme Court.
The state government's decision to amend the 1994 act and the rules is meant to comply with the Supreme Court judgment.
Last week, former chief minister and BSP president Mayawati had asked the Centre to enact a constitutional amendment to undo the Supreme Court judgment. Her party had staged a walkout in the Rajya Sabha.
However, the Sarvajan Hitaya Sanrakshan Samiti, an organisation of employees fighting against reservation in promotions, had demanded that the government implement the SC judgment without delay. It pointed out that, in its election manifesto, the Samajwadi Party had promised that it would deal with the issue of "reservation in promotion according to the directions of the Supreme Court".
2 comments:
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT ARTICLE.WHAT EVER HAS BEEN WRITTEN IN THE ARTICLE SHOULD BE FOLLOWED IN TO TO FOR EVER---CAPTAIN A.K.CHOUDHARY
Reservation may be considered only upto admission stage but subsequent promotions should be purely on merit. Otherwise the entire administration in the country would deteriorate further.
Though what Mr.Danendra Jain suggested about seniority based promotions has its own logic like controlling interference in promotions, reducing "yes boss" tendency etc, it also has certain side effects like staff taking for granted their automatic promotions which may result in deterioration in efficient work culture. Instead of 100% seniority based promotions, it may be wise to consider a percentage for efficiency based promotions also to encourage efficient workers. However this should be totally transparent. All the interviews conducted in the promotion process should be done in camera and recorded, written tests and their valuations should be kept in the internet along with the interview proceedings etc for public scrutiny to minimise manipulations. If at any point of time it comes to light that anyone promoted by manipulation, the punishments should be severe to discourage such manipulations.
Post a Comment